About 'publicly traded accounting firms'|...stock trades are high frequency trading: •The former head of Nasdaq said that high frequency traders account for 73% of the volume on the stock market...
by uncletumbleweed http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/wallstreet/weill/demise.html I give you the URL because that article is copywrited and I do not have permission to reproduce it. To just give you excerpts or quotes would not do justice to the fine job done by the author, and PBS. This is an article from PBS frontline in May of 2003 that outlines the Glass-Steagall Act from its beginnings to its untimely demise in November of 1999 with, then president, William Jefferson Clinton signing into law the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999. This legislation began as S 900 and H. Res. 355. I have researched the congressional record site, for documents related to these proceedings, and it is alarming to me that the current bailout funds, from H.R.1424, are being paid to the very institutions, and individuals, that helped bring about the legislation that permitted the current economic debacle to happen! Those very same institutions frequently participated in the legislative processes bringing The Commodity Futures Modernization Act to being passed into law. 106TH CONGRESS 2D SESSION H. R. 5660 To reauthorize and amend the Commodity Exchange Act to promote legal certainty, enhance competition, and reduce systemic risk in markets for futures and over-the-counter derivatives, and for other purposes. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DECEMBER 14, 2000 Mr. EWING (for himself, Mr. COMBEST, Mr. LEACH, Mr. LAFALCE, and Mr. BLILEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committees on Banking and Financial Services, Commerce, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL To reauthorize and amend the Commodity Exchange Act to promote legal certainty, enhance competition, and reduce systemic risk in markets for futures and over-the-counter derivatives, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. SHORT TITLE: This Act may be cited as the "Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000''. ................................................ The CFMA was subsequently added into another piece of legislation, [H.R.4577 Title: Making appropriations for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Porter, John Edward [IL-10] (introduced 6/1/2000) Cosponsors (None) Related Bills: H.RES.515, H.RES.518, H.R.5656, H.R.5657, H.R.5658, H.R.5660, H.R.5661, H.R.5662, H.R.5663, H.R.5666, H.R.5667, S.CON.RES.162, S.1594, S.2553 Latest Major Action: Became Public Law No: 106-554 [GPO: Text, PDF] House Reports: 106-645; Latest Conference Report: 106-1033 (in Congressional Record H12100-12439) Note: H.R. 4577, the Consolidated Appropriations Act 2001, incorporated in its conference report the provisions of several bills by reference. This included H.R. 5656 - Labor HHS Education Appropriations; H.R. 5657 - Legislative Branch Appropriations; H.R. 5658 - Treasury Appropriations; H.R. 5666 - Miscellaneous Appropriations - except section 123 relating to the enactment of H.R. 4904; H.R. 5660 - Commodity Futures Modernization; H.R. 5661 - Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Benefits Improvement and Protection; H.R. 5662 - Community Renewal Tax Relief and Medical Savings Accounts; H.R. 5663 - New Markets Venture Capital Program; and H.R. 5667 - Small Business Reauthorization. This excerpt from the text of this legislation leads me to believe Congress had no clue what they had just passed. (no pun intended, but they ARE blaming it on each other...uncletumbleweed) CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE COST ESTIMATE S. 2697--Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 Summary: S. 2697 would reauthorize funding for the activities of the Commodity futures Trading Commission (CFTC) during the 2001-2005 period. The bill would also allow the trading of single stock futures under certain conditions, with oversight being shared by the CFTC and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In addition, S. 2697 would clarify that certain over-the-counter derivative transactions are outside of the jurisdiction of the CFTC. The bill also would authorize the CFTC to designate boards of trade as contract markets or execution facilities for derivatives transactions. Assuming appropriation of the necessary amounts, CBO estimates that implementing this legislation would cost $363 million over the 2001-2005 period. Although most of this cost would be incurred by the CFTC, CBO estimates that the SEC would spend about $3 million a year to regulate single stock futures. S. 2697 also would increase governmental receipts, because the bill would make single stock futures subject to fees charged by the SEC. Although CBO estimates that this increase in fee collections would not be significant, pay-as-you-go procedures would apply. S. 2697 contains an intergovernmental mandate as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA), but CBO estimates that the costs, if any, would not exceed the threshold established in the act ($55 million in 2000, adjusted annually for inflation). The bill also contains a new private-sector mandate as defined by UMRA, but CBO estimates the costs of this mandate would not exceed the threshold established in the act ($109 million in 2000, adjusted annually for inflation). Estimated Cost to the Federal Government: The estimated budgetary impact of S. 2697 ....(exceeded their wildest guess!...uncletumbleweed) Basis of estimate: For this estimate, CBO assumes that the bill will be enacted by the end of fiscal year 2000 and that the necessary amounts will be appropriated by the start of each fiscal year. Provisions related to the regulation of single stock futures would take effect one year after enactment. CBO estimates that S. 2697 would cost $363 million over the 2001-2005 period, and would have a negligible effect on revenues. My personal recommendations are: The record of proceedings concerning these pieces of...uh, legislation, footage from C-Span, as well as security footage from areas frequented by legislators, lobbyists and their staff personnel during these proceedings, should be reviewed by the FBI for any traces of conspiracy or collusion between legislators, corporate entities, and lobbyists. The financial records of the corporations, individuals guiding those corporations (then and now) and public officials identified as being involved in this should be examined by the FBI, IRS, and the SEC. Anyone implicated in bringing this disaster about for their own enrichment, at the expense of the security of the United States of America, regardless of their current, or former, station in life, should be tried, and if found guilty, PUNISHED, under any, and all, applicable laws including the Patriot Act. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 should be repealed...immediately. International corporate banking entities are making side bets against the United States making an economic recovery! Do you think Deutschbank's predictions that American auto makers will fail is just idle speculation? Locks are meant to keep honest people honest (Lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil...from The Lord's Prayer) These actions should be undertaken, in a bipartisan manner, swiftly and publicly, to help restore America's image as a nation of the people and for the people. If we want the rest of the world to follow our lead, we darn well better do some house cleanin'. If we do not do this, then we are no better than some third world nation where some live in outrageous luxury, above the law, while others continuously suffer. CFMA RESEARCH: COALITION of INVESTMENT AND COMMERCIAL BANKS regarding THE REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT'S WORKING GROUP ON FINANCIAL MARKETS entitled OVER-THE-COUNTER DERIVATIVES MARKETS AND THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT before the COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE, NUTRITION AND FORESTRY UNITED STATES SENATE FEBRUARY 10, 2000 Chairman Lugar, members of the Committee, this testimony is submitted by Edward Rosen, a partner with Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, on behalf of an ad hoc coalition of investment and commercial banks (the "Coalition"). The Coalition is comprised of the following institutions: The Chase Manhattan Bank, Citigroup Inc., Credit Suisse First Boston Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co., Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. This Coalition is grateful for the opportunity to present the Committee with the Coalition's views regarding the report of the President's Working Group on Financial Markets (the "Working Group") entitled Over-the-Counter Derivatives Markets and the Commodity Exchange Act (the "Report"). The Coalition supports the recommendations set forth in the Report and urges the Committee to incorporate the Report's recommendations in legislation during this session.... ...................................................................................... The PWG that released the study http://www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/reports/otcact.pdf, presented Nov. 19, 1999, consisted of: Greenspan, Alan, Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC Summers, Lawrence, Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC Levitt, Arthur, Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC Rainer, William, Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Washington, DC Gore, Al, President of the Senate, United States Senate, Washington, D.C .......................................................................................................... February 22, 2002 ....PAUL SOLMAN: Over at the CFTC, meanwhile, say critics, the regulators didn't regulate Enron by choice, exempting the company from regulation back in 1993, the last act of outgoing chair Wendy Gramm, wife of Texas Senator Phil Gramm. Professor Michael Greenberger was a CFTC lawyer in the late-'90s. MICHAEL GREENBERGER, University of Maryland Law School: After these exemptions took place, they could in private make deals about how they would trade energy, and they were completely deregulated. Nobody knew about them. PAUL SOLMAN: Wendy Gramm, meanwhile, became an Enron board member within weeks of the exemptions vote, while Enron and others kept pushing for less regulation. MICHAEL GREENBERGER: Exemptions weren't big enough after time went. They wanted to do more. So the philosophy they adopted and the philosophy industry adopted was twofold: We're just going to ignore the regulators, we're going to lobby like crazy on the Hill, and we're going to convince Congress that this area needs to be deregulated in Toto. And they achieved that objective in December of 2000. PAUL SOLMAN: The achievement was the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, legislation that exempted Enron and others permanently from CFTC oversight, written in part by Senator Gramm. Enron, however, was but one of many, says Elizabeth Ritter. ELIZABETH RITTER: Enron was one of dozens of energy, metals, banks, and market participants that come and talk to us, that go to the Hill. I mean, Enron was not... certainly by any means, the largest player who came and talked to us or tried to tell us what they wanted and what they needed. PAUL SOLMAN: As to Enron's collapse, says Ritter... ELIZABETH RITTER: There is certainly a perceived problem with accounting and disclosure issues and auditing issues. That's a completely separate issue from the trading paradigm. PAUL SOLMAN: And trading is what the CFTC regulates. But the kind of trading Enron was pioneering became a separate issue outside the CFTC's jurisdiction for a simple reason, says Greenberger: That's the way Congress wanted it. PAUL SOLMAN: What happens? A Congressperson calls on the phone and says, "Hey, you guys, I hear what you are talking about; forget it"? I mean... MICHAEL GREENBERGER, Former CFTC Lawyer: What happens is, not a Congressperson, but five different committees have hearings, call you up, ask you to testify, and scream at you for interfering with the free market system; that you're slowing down the American economy by trying to get some transparency in the system. The banks and the corporations are saying, "Hey, how can these federal financial regulators do this? We're very sophisticated people. We don't need to be regulated."... (How is that workin' out for ya?...uncletumbleweed) ............................................................................................ [Page: S11879] Congressional Record Issue: the commodity futures modernization act of 2000 -- (Senate - December 15, 2000) Section of Record: Senate [Page: S11878] --- THE COMMODITY FUTURES MODERNIZATION ACT OF 2000 Mr. FITZGERALD. Mr. President, I rise in support of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 (``CFMA''), the proposed legislation to reauthorize the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``CFTC'') and to amend the Commodity Exchange Act (``CEA''). This legislation is the Senate companion of H.R. 5660, which Congressman THOMAS EWING introduced yesterday in the House of Representatives and which is part of the final appropriations measure. As an original co-sponsor of the CFMA, I am proud to join Chairmen GRAMM and LUGAR in supporting legislation to provide much needed regulatory relief to the United States futures exchanges, to remove the eighteen-year-old ban on single stock futures, and to bring legal certainty in the multi-trillion dollar derivatives markets. The CFMA gives a substantial boost to Chicago's futures industry and the 200,000 jobs that depend on it. The Chicago futures exchanges will be given an opportunity to compete on a level playing field with the world markets. Burdensome federal regulations will be removed and a new regulatory structure will be implemented that will give our nation's most important futures exchanges the ability to compete equally with world markets in product innovation and the ever-changing demands of the marketplace. Chicago's exchanges will now have the opportunity to offer single stock futures so that they can compete with global markets already trading those types of futures. This is potentially an enormous market for Chicago's exchanges and U.S. investors. It goes without saying that this market is absolutely necessary for Chicago to remain the center for world futures trading. I commend Chairman LUGAR on his efforts to act swiftly to modernize the CEA and to implement the recommendations of the President's Working Group on Financial Markets (``PWG''). The challenges involved in such an undertaking are enormous and I appreciate Chairman LUGAR's thoughtful and comprehensive approach to this complex task. As Chairman of the Subcommittee on Research, Nutrition, and General Legislation, I have been actively involved in the evolution of the CFMA and am committed to working closely with Chairman LUGAR, Chairman GRAMM, and my other colleagues to ensure that the United States derivatives markets remain strong, competitive, and viable. The CFMA codifies the recommendations of the PWG to enhance legal certainty for over-the-counter (``OTC'') derivatives by excluding from the CEA certain bilateral swaps entered into on a principal-to-principal basis by eligible participants. The market for OTC derivatives has exploded over the past two decades into a multi-trillion dollar industry. These large and sophisticated markets play an important role in the global economy and legal certainty is a critical consideration for parties to OTC derivative contracts. Accordingly, the CFMA recognizes that legal certainty for OTC derivatives is vital to the continued competitiveness of the United States markets and achieves this certainty by excluding these transactions from the CEA. The provisions of the CFMA also address the problem that federal regulation has not adapted to the rapid growth of the financial markets and today serves as a substantial restriction on market competitiveness and modernization. In order for the United States to maintain the most efficient markets in the world, regulatory barriers to fair competition must be removed. The CFMA reduces the inefficiencies of the CEA by removing constraints on innovation and competitiveness and by transforming the CFTC into an oversight agency with less front-line regulatory functions. The provisions for three kinds of trading facilities with varying levels of regulation provide needed flexibility to both traditional exchanges and electronic trading facilities by basing oversight of the futures markets on the types of products they trade and on the investors they serve. Finally, the CFMA removes the Accord's prohibitions on the trading of single stock futures and small indices. Stock index futures have matured into vital financial management tools that enable a wide variety of investment concerns to manage their risk of adverse price movements. The options markets and swaps dealers offer customers risk management tools and investment alternatives involving both sector indexes and single stock derivatives. It seems only fair that futures exchanges be allowed to compete in this important market. The CFMA lifts the ban on single and index stock futures restrictions to allow the marketplace to decide whether these instruments would be useful risk management tools and to enhance the ability of the U.S. financial markets to compete in the global marketplace. The bill reforms the Accord to allow both futures and securities exchanges to trade these products under the jurisdiction of their current regulators. The CFMA also allows both the SEC and the CFTC to enforce violations of their respective laws regardless of whether the products are traded on a futures or securities exchange and requires that the agencies share necessary information for enforcement purposes. The CFMA represents an arduous effort to remove burdensome regulatory structures and provide much needed legal certainty to the United States derivatives markets. This effort has produced comprehensive legislation that is designed to remove impediments to innovation and regulatory barriers to fair competition for the United States financial markets. The positive impact of this legislation on Chicago's futures markets cannot be overstated. The CFMA is vital to Chicago remaining the derivatives capital of the world and gives Chicago's futures exchanges the ability to lead the way in the potentially explosive single-stock futures market. (Again I ask: How's that workin' out for ya? Hey, wait a second...Chicago is in Illinois. This is getting curiouser and curiouser, huh?) This particular SEC item of business is directly attributable to the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, and even includes links for offering your feedback and input. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 17 CFR PARTS 230, 240 and 260 [Release Nos. 33-8999; 34-59246; 39-2549; File No. S7-02-09] RIN 3235-AK26 Temporary Exemptions for Eligible Credit Default Swaps To Facilitate Operation of Central Counterparties To Clear and Settle Credit Default Swaps AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission. ACTION: Interim final temporary rules; request for comments. SUMMARY: We are adopting interim final temporary rules providing exemptions under the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 for certain credit default swaps to facilitate the operation of one or more central counterparties for those credit default swaps. The interim final temporary rules define such credit default swaps as ''eligible credit default swaps'' and exempt them from all provisions of the Securities Act, other than the Section 17(a) anti-fraud provisions, as well as from Exchange Act registration requirements and from the provisions of the Trust Indenture Act, provided certain conditions are met.... DATES: Effective Date: The interim final temporary rules are effective January 22, 2009 until September 25, 2009. Comment Date: Comments on the interim final temporary rules should be received on or before March 23, 2009. ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments Use the Commission's Internet comment form http://www.sec.gov/ rules/interim-final-temp.shtm Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include File Number S7-02-09 on the subject line; or Use the Federal Rulemaking Portal http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number S7-02-09. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help us process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site http://www.sec.gov/rules/interim-final-temp.shtml. Comments are also available for public inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. All comments received will be posted without change; we do not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. The answer to that question is ....These corporations have taken advantage of regulation delays in order to take themselves out of the realm of regulation altogether. The following URL's are linked to an electronic trading network, advertising themselves as a platform for trading OVER THE COUNTER CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS, (sorry, was I shouting?) which intuitive conviction tells me, will be used to transfer toxic debt to the highest bidder. Debts secured by mortgages, AND DEEDS, to property in the USA. http://www.euronext.com/editorial/wide/editorial-43618-EN.html The following two revenue share schemes are in place for Liffe CDS contracts CDS Reporting Scheme rewards those registered Members who submit CDS transactions to Bclear CDS Clearing Scheme rewards those registered Clearing Members who clear CDS contracts Both schemes allocate a total of 20% of net revenues derived from Liffe CDS contracts. Please refer to London Notice No.3098 for further information. Approved registered members on these schemes: Banca IMI SPA Banco Santander S.A. Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG BGC Brokers LP Calyon SA Citigroup Markets Ltd Credit Suisse Securities Europe Ltd Deutsche Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank Dresdner Bank AG GFI Securities Limited Goldman Sachs International HSBC Bank PLC ICAP Securities Ltd J P Morgan Securities Limited Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg Liquid Capital Securities Merrill Lynch International MF Global UK Limited Natixis Newedge Group SA Nomura International PLC Rabobank International Royal Bank of Canada Europe Limited Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) Société Générale The Royal Bank of Scotland Tradition Securities And Futures Tullet Prebon (Securities) Limited UBS Clearing & Execution Services Limited UBS Limited ( I HAVE TAKEN THE LIBERTY OF UNDERLINING SOME OF THE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS THAT HAVE RECEIVED MEDIA ATTENTION FOR THEIR PART IN THE CURRENT ECONOMIC SITUATION...uncletumbleweed) Publication of any name as a Registered Beneficiary in the Revenue Share Clearing Scheme or Reporting Scheme for Credit Default Swap ("CDS") Index Contracts on Bclear does not indicate that such name(s) are operationally ready to facilitate CDS Contracts on Bclear. Potential users of Bclear for CDS business should direct any enquiries about operational readiness to the named Registered Beneficiary concerned. This URL will take you to an interesting article which explains how money can be moved offshore. http://www.hedgeweek.com/articles/detail.jsp?content_id=271320 (OH, by the way, I have sent this article to ... as many "alphabet soup" agencies as I could, hoping they have some influence in getting laws enacted to prevent flight of capital...) The following URL links take you to advertising for some services offered by electronic exchanges: http://www.euronext.com/fic/000/042/273/422732.pdf http://www.euronext.com/fic/000/042/273/422733.pdf http://www.euronext.com/fic/000/035/309/353093.pdf CDS Publications (Dates are dd/mm/yyyy...uncletumbleweed) Adobe reader is required to view these documents Date 22/01/2008 Title CDS on Bclear - some FAQs 22/01/2009 CDS on Bclear: an overview 22/01/2009 CDS on Bclear - technology 22/01/2009 CDS on Bclear - fees 01/11/2008 Greenwich Associates - August 2008: Counterparty Risk as Growing Threat 01/11/2008 Credit Magazine - October 2008: CDS Processing 01/12/2008 Hedgeweek Special Report - November 2008: Innovation 27/01/2009 Bclear GUI for CDS ............................................................................ The Congressional Oversight Panel's "Special Report on Regulatory Reform" (January, 2009) begins with this evaluation of the situation, yet, the exemptions granted to take effect on 01/22/2009 coincide with Bclear's agenda. I. Executive Summary 1. Lessons from the Past Financial crises are not new. As early as 1792, during the presidency of George Washington, the nation suffered a severe panic that froze credit and nearly brought the young economy to its knees. Over the next 140 years, financial crises struck on a regular basis-in 1797, 1819, 1837, 1857, 1873, 1893-96, 1907, and 1929-33-roughly every fifteen to twenty years. But as the United States emerged from the Great Depression, something remarkable happened: the crises stopped. New financial regulation-including federal deposit insurance, securities regulation, and banking supervision-effectively protected the system from devastating outbreaks. Economic growth returned, but recurrent financial crises did not. In time, a financial crisis was seen as a ghost of the past. After fifty years without a financial crisis-the longest such stretch in the nation's history-financial firms and policy makers began to see regulation as a barrier to efficient functioning of the capital markets rather than a necessary precondition for success. This change in attitude had unfortunate consequences. As financial markets grew and globalized, often with breathtaking speed, the U.S. regulatory system could have benefited from smart changes. But deregulation and the growth of unregulated, parallel shadow markets were accompanied by the nearly unrestricted marketing of increasingly complex consumer financial products that multiplied risk at every stratum of the economy, from the family level to the global level. The result proved disastrous. The first warning followed deregulation of the thrifts, when the country suffered the savings and loan crisis in the 1980s. A second warning came in 1998 when a crisis was only narrowly averted following the failure of a large unregulated hedge fund. The near financial panic of 2002, brought on by corporate accounting and governance failures, sounded a third warning. The United States now faces its worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. It is critical that the lessons of that crisis be studied to restore a proper balance between free markets and the regulatory framework necessary to ensure the operation of those markets to protect the economy, honest market participants, and the public. 2. Shortcomings of the Present The current crisis should come as no surprise. The present regulatory system has failed to effectively manage risk, require sufficient transparency, and ensure fair dealings. Conclusion: The events beginning on March 9, 2009 will determine if I am correct that what we are about to experience in financial upheaval, political upheaval, and religious upheaval are the result of a collusion, conspiracy, or partisan stupidity. The true irony of partisan stupidity is: It has been bipartisan! |
Image of publicly traded accounting firms
publicly traded accounting firms Image 1
publicly traded accounting firms Image 2
publicly traded accounting firms Image 3
publicly traded accounting firms Image 4
publicly traded accounting firms Image 5
Related blog with publicly traded accounting firms
- goldenmarketing.typepad.com/By Roni Robbins: Only a few weeks into 2008 some accounting firms with smaller publicly traded clients may be wondering whether they should redo their own books...
- realgemstonefile.blogspot.com/...since Loeb won’t blow the whistle on the Chappaquiddick phone call records on account of the millions he received from Hoffa. LBJ issues a Mafia...
- knightlight65.wordpress.com/...statement. It’s not just industry self-policing, though. Publicly traded accounting firms must be SAS 70 certified by law. Certification ...
- purplepinupguru.blogspot.com/... to light on May 6th 2004 in the Willamette Week newspaper. Goldschmidt publicly announced that he had engaged in a sexual relationship with...
- slatersbusiness.wordpress.com/...2012 Leave a comment Accounting plays an...highly reliable individual or firm. In the United States, publicly traded corporations...
- cc-times.blogspot.com/... for firms that turn in fraudulent... fraudulent accounting by KPMG in its... of publicly traded companies...
- lalqila.wordpress.com/... advisory firm combines this publicly available information... universe of trading stats. “We have...trading now accounts for about 56 percent...
- busmovie.typepad.com/...improve things. As to whether it’s fanciful, consider this post on publicly traded law firms in the UK (one of many on this issue) over at Adam Smith, Esq. Of course...
- lawprofessors.typepad.com/...that quarter. BMO was Optionable's largest customer, and BMO trades accounted for as much as 60% of Optionable's commodity brokerage business. Lee's trading...
- raymondpronk.wordpress.com/...right to know the true value of publicly-traded companies. Says...Chase: “Blaming fair-value accounting for the credit crisis is...
Publicly Traded Accounting Firms - Blog Homepage Results
... States, publicly traded corporations find...by of the of the big 4 accounting firms. Being audited...
...comment to your blog. You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change ) You are commenting using your Facebook...
Related Video with publicly traded accounting firms
publicly traded accounting firms Video 1
publicly traded accounting firms Video 2
publicly traded accounting firms Video 3